Nvidia GTX 680 Kepler

But it should still score higher if the fps are higher and the temps are lower... but it doesnt. Its a bad benchmark that claims a card that performs worse is a better card.

Furmark is one of those benchmarks that I ignore, along with 3dmark. They're kind of meaningless. I go by the benchmarks from games that I actually play.

So am I to assume like most series of cards this is going to start dropping the 500 series
a bit more that it has already? Might need to get another 570. Seems that's how its typically been..

the fps and temps wouldnt be a bad way to compare generally but their scoring system seems out of whack. Tomshardware and anandtech are moving to other programs (like bitcoin) to stress the hardware with a program that doesnt kick the safeguards in.

I agree. Synthetic benchmarks designed to try to kill your video card arent a good benchmark for anything other than the cooler on the card and the power supply in your pc. What irks me though is their own website says the object of their program is to get the highest fps with the lowest temp then their burn-in score is lower for a card that got higher fps and lower temp than another card. Its like saying the purpose of your bake sale is to send the senior class on a trip and then taking the money and blowing it all on shoes.

[edit] ok the reply system didnt act like I was thinking it would... sorry. This reply was to Nacelle[/edit]

I like the Bitcoin test. Also, folding has a huge following that people use some crazy setups for.