- Posts: 195
- Thank you received: 41
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
garfi3ld wrote: I just fixed it again, don't break it again :-P
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
garfi3ld wrote: i read somewhere that another one sold on ebay a few days ago. I'm sure Intel is watching closely and taking care of them lol
I wonder how it performs :-P
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
SpeedBump wrote:
garfi3ld wrote: i read somewhere that another one sold on ebay a few days ago. I'm sure Intel is watching closely and taking care of them lol
I wonder how it performs :-P
Off hand I can remember reading something about performance. Overall, there is some, but not much of an increase over Ivy clock for clock, but where it does pick up a good bit is the graphics. This chip was intended to be geared towards power usage (ie mobile platforms) while still maintaining very good desktop performance. To me, being a desktop enthusiast, the graphics core is really not even on my radar. I have never used, and probably will never use a desktop CPU's integrated GPU even if I were to build a HTPC due to there being soo many super inexpensive, silent/near silent discrete GPUs that will had any graphic chip like this its a$$. I REALLY wish Intel (and AMD for that matter) would release an "old school" CPU. Just give me a 4, 6 or 8 core, 5gHz+ Haswell WITH NO GPU. I'll let Nvidia handle my graphics, thank you very much!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.